can any one tell me how to select the exit name
Re: SMS triggering after sales order creation
Re: How to add a new field group and assign a field to it (Fixed Assets)
Hello,
well after almost one year after the initial post, herewith the answer:
Try first OAVM and then OAVN
hope it helps. Please assign points if usefull
best regards,
Re: SMS triggering after sales order creation
Dear Venkat,
I need the exit name for SMS triggering to the customer when the sales order is saved
Re: me21n address data tab display vendor's email
did you ever find a solution to this issue if so can you share it? have a similar need
Re: me21n address data tab display vendor's email
Check enhancement MM06E005 (trx SMOD) for this usecase.
How to implement an user exit
Hi Export,
I want to implement user exit EXIT_SAPLEINM_001 in enhancement MM06E001. But MM06E001 has already belongs to an existing project and the project did not implement this user exit. How I can do it?
Thanks,
Meiying
Re: How to implement an user exit
If understand right, there is already an project in trx CMOD for MM06E001 but EXIT_SAPLEINM_001 is not activated in. Then simply activate component and implement your code.
Re: How to implement an user exit
Hi Michael,
How I can activate EXIT_SAPLEINM_001 in the project? I see there is no green check in "Impl" column for EXIT_SAPLEINM_001.
Thanks,
Meiying
Re: How to implement an user exit
In trx CMOD first deactivate project.Then try to activate component. Then activate project again.
Re: How to implement an user exit
I don't see anywhere I can activate the component. I deactivated the project. then double clicked component EXIT_SAPLEINM_001, it leads me to the FM. Then I double click INCLUDE ZXM06U01. It doesn't work. And I activated FM EXIT_SAPLEINM_001, but it still did not implement ( no green check on column "Impl"). Can you tell me how?.
Re: How to implement an user exit
When double click INCLUDE ZXM06U01. System shows only a warning DS027. Simply press enter to proceed.
Re: How to implement an user exit
Yes. You are right. It works.
Thank you!
Meiying
Custom field names and mandatory fields not being displayed in custom help search when it is not the first tab displayed
We have customized the CO object search help in order to customize some fields names and set some mandatory fields.
It seems to work correctly only when this search help tab is opened as default, i.e. when it is the first one displayed.
It must be checked than:
-"Company Code/Sociedad" and "Profit Center Group/Grupo de CeBe" are mandatory fields, and have '?' symbols inside the search help.
-"Descr. Grupo CeBe", "CeBe" and "Descripción CeBe" are custom field names, replacing the standard "Profit Center Group Descr.", "Profit Center" and "Profit Center Description"
However, if a different search help tab is opened as default, when I open this custom tab custom fields names are no longer displayed and question marks for mandatory fields have disappeared.
Example: I open the match-code help, and "Joint venture" tab is the first one to be displayed (because it was the last one I selected last time I used the transaction).
When I select my custom help search tab after "Joint venture", I find the following problems:
-Mandatory fields marked with '?' symbols have no longer this symbol, i.e. they are not mandatory anymore.
-Custom fields name have been replaced by the standard field names.
It occurs, for example, in transaction KS02 for the Cost Center match code.
Technical details are explained in my next post. My apologies for the screenshots in Spanish. Many thanks in advance for your help
Re: Custom field names and mandatory fields not being displayed in custom help search when it is not the first tab displayed
Here I give a deeper technical details:
We customized help search for Cost Center, WBS Elements and Internal Orders. To do so we modified descriptions of some help fields in table SHLP type CHANGING. We also informed in SHLP-FIELDDESCR the following fields: REPTEXT, SCRTEXT_S, SCRTEXT_M and SCRTEXT_L.
These changes are donde in CALLCONTROL-STEP = 'PRESEL1'
Mandatory fields are set in CALLCONTROL-SETP = 'PRESEL1' using function F4UT_PARAMETER_REQUIRED'
Example:
CALL FUNCTION 'F4UT_PARAMETER_REQUIRED'
EXPORTING
parameter_required = 'KOKRS'
not required = ' '
TABLE
shlp_tabl = shlp_tab
record_tab = record_tab
CHANGING
shlp = shlp
callcontrol = callcontrol.
The changes are only visible when this search help tab is the first loaded in multiple help search.
In the same way, mandatory fields are only visible when this search help tab is the first loaded.
This is happening for the following help searchs:
- ORDE
- PRPM
- KOST
Re: Posting document with profit segment values (FB01)
Hi Vinod Kumar,
The above wiki link is not worked.
if you have idea on passing Profit segment to FM (BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST) please explain me.
Regards,
Narasaiah T.
Validate service data in ME51n
Hello experts,
We have a requirement to fetch all the data from service tab corresponding to a line item and do certain validations.
Kindly advice on the feasibility.
Thanks,
Anju
Enhancement of Infostructures S635,S701 in MCSI Report
Hi all,
I have a Enhancement requirement for Infostructures S635 and S701 in MCSI Report wherein :-
(1) Enhancement of the structure S635, so that the credit notes are taken into account
Customer yearly rebates are calculated based on invoiced revenue (partner role “Auftraggeber”) as shown in MCSI structure S635. The figures are not correct because the credit notes ZRE and S2 are missing. The Table TMC2 has to be modified.
The invoice types which are missing are ZRE and S2.
The data comes from the Info structure S635.
The missing invoices, billing types ZRE and S2 are in the update group Z010, which is why this data is missing in MCSI. The line 400 / S635 / Z010 is missing is the table TMC2. We need the same export as S700/Z008&Z010 and S701/Z008&Z010
(2)Put new fields in the existing reports S635 and S701.
Transaction MCSI:
- S635 Selection screen:
- S701 selection screen:
In both selection screens, the fields SD-Auftrag, Projekt and CS-Auftrag are needed.
In both reports S635 and S701, the fields SD-Auftrag, CS-Auftrag and Projekt should be available in the “Aufriss”.
Regards,
Ajay
Re: Add ekpo custom fields to item overview grid in ME22N/ME23N transacction.
Re: Add ekpo custom fields to item overview grid in ME22N/ME23N transacction.
Did you try to append fields of CI_EKPODB to structure MEPO1211?
Regards,
Raymond
Transport Dependencies of Composite Enhancement Implementation
Hi All,
Hopefully a simple question this time. I've created a Composite Enhancement Implementation and inside it I've included three Enhancement Implementations. Due to our testing timeline, the three Enhancement Implementations may need to be transported separately. My assumption is that the relationship to the Subordinate Implementations is stored in the Composite Implementation itself, and so the Composite would have to be transported only after all three Subordinates are already in the target system. Can someone verify whether this is the case?
Thanks,
Alex